MATAN HADIS CRITICISM METHODOLOGY Comparative Analysis between Muhammad Syuhudi Ismail and Muḥammad Al-Gazāliy

  • Wely Dozan uin sunan kalijaga yogyakarta
  • Zuliyadain Zuliyadain

Abstract

Tracing the history of hadith is a common thing to be studied and carried out by various academic circles. Along with the dynamics which are quite dynamic, there have been problems including Islamic thought and even orientalist thinking to examine the hadith texts of the Prophet Muhammad which is growing rapidly, especially in the study of hadith studies. There are two main aspects of the foundation in hadith research, namely between authentic and skeptical. The term becomes the result of the conclusion when the hadith has been carried out both in terms of the quality of the sanad, matan, and narration. However, understanding the hadith does not revolve around the concept of understanding the content and substance of the hadith. how Islamic thinkers try to reconstruct the methodology in understanding the criticism of hadith so that the hadiths achieved are truly accurate and maintain traditions from errors and falsehoods. This paper tries to explore the ideas of Muhammad Syhudi and Muhammad al-Ghazaliy in theory development (Matan Hadith Criticism Methodology). Then the author tries to prove and support the development of the study of hadith studies, especially academics in conducting hadith research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Yusuf Qardhawi, Syekh Muhammad Al-Ghazali Yang Saya Kenal, Jakarta: Rabbani Press, 1999.
Muhammad al-Gazaliy, Fiqh al-Sirah,(Kairo: Dar al-Bayan li al-Turas, 1987.
Suryadi, Metode Kontemporer Memahami Hadis Nabi, Perspektif Muhammad al Ghazali dan Yusuf al Qaradhawi, Yogyakarta: Teras, 2008.
Asih Kurniasih dan Moh Alif, “Metodologi Kritik Matan Hadis (Kajian terhadap Kitab Al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah Baina Ahl al-Fiqh wa Ahl al-Hadis karya Muhammad al-Gazaliy), Holistic al hadis: Jurnal Studi Hadis, Keindonesiaan, dan Integrasi Keilmuan, Vol.4, No. 2, 2018.
Sahiron Syamsuddin, , Hermeneutika al-Qur’an dan Hadis, Yogyakarta: eLSAQ Press, 2010.
Muhammad Syuhudi Ismail, Kaedah Kesahihan Sanad Hadis, Telaah Kritis dan Tinjauan dengan Pendekatan Ilmu Sejarah, Cet. Ke-1, Jakarta: PT Bulan Bintang, 1994
Arifuddin Ahmad, “Pembaharuan Pemikiran tentang Hadis Nabi saw. di Indonesia, Studi atas Pemikiran Muhammad Syuhudi Ismail” Disertasi, Jakarta: Program Pascasarjana UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, 2000.
Syuhudi, Pengantar Ilmu Hadis, Cet ke-10, Bandung: Penerbit Angkasa, 1991.
Muslim A. Kadir, Ilmu Islam Terapan; Menggagas Paradigma Amali dalam Agama Islam, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2003.
M. Hasbi al-Shidieqi, Sejarah dan Pengantar Ilmu Hadis, Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1958.
M. Syuhudi Ismail, Kaedah Kesahihan Sanad Hadis, Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1998.
M. Alfatih Suryadilaga, Aplikasi Peneltiian Hadis dari Teks ke Konteks, Yogyakarta: Teras, 2009.
M. M. Azami, Hadis dan Sejarah Kodifikasinya, terj. Ali Mustafa Ya’qub, Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 1994.
Muhammad Al-Ghazali, Fiqh al-Sirah, Kairo: Dar al-Bayn li Turas, 1987.
Endad Musaddad, Kompleksitas Studi Hadis, Banten: FUD Press, 2009.
Ahmad Fudhaiil, Perempuan di Lembaran Suci “Kritik atas Hadis-hadis Shahih”, Jakarta: Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia, 2012.
Bustamin. M. Isa, Metodologi Kritik Hadis, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004.
Nasaruddin Baidan, Erwati Aziz, Metode Penelitian Tafsir, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2016.
Abdul Mustaqim, Metode Penelitian Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, Yogyakarta: Idea Press, 2015.
Rosihon Anwar, Ilmu Tafsir, Bandung: Pustaka Setia, Cet. 1, 2000.
Arifuddin Ahmad, Paradigma Baru Memahami Hadis Nabi. Cet. I, Jakarta: Renaisan, 2005.
Muhammad Syuhudi Ismail, Metodologi Penelitian Hadis. Cet. I, Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1992.
Kasban.,dkk, Kritik Matan Syaikh Muḥammad Al-Gazāliy, AT-TAHDIS: Journal of Hadith Studies, Vol. 1 No. 1, Januari-Juni 2017.
Published
2022-06-30
How to Cite
Dozan, W., & Zuliyadain, Z. (2022, June 30). MATAN HADIS CRITICISM METHODOLOGY Comparative Analysis between Muhammad Syuhudi Ismail and Muḥammad Al-Gazāliy. HUNAFA: Jurnal Studia Islamika, 19(1), 120-140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24239/jsi.v19i1.656.120-140